28 August 2009

3 Raymond Buildings & Sir John Nutting QC

I am suspicious that 3 Raymond Buildings is being used by MI5, the Security Service, to handle their cases under the Official Secrets Act. Sir John Nutting QC is certainly a senior member of 3 Raymond Buildings, and he boasts about having won my case on behalf of MI5, despite the fact that it was necessary to use the false testimony of Professor Meirion Francis Lewis to do so.

I was told that 3 Raymond Buildings has for a long time been the chambers used for MI5 prosecutions, and I would be grateful for any comments that can be added to this story.

27 August 2009

John Kelsey-Fry QC & Gary Summers

Before and during my Official Secrets Act trial John Kelsey-Fry QC was the Prosecution go-between with the Defence team, talking with my barrister Gary Summers about what was happening in the case. Obviously, one important matter that was not discussed was that the Prosecution were planning an ambush on the Defence over the so-called "evidence" about the ALARM missile.

The evidence of Professor Meirion Francis Lewis was clearly known to the Prosecution prior to my trial in September of 1993, because they had some well rehearsed questions about what would be presented to the jury.

John Kelsey-Fry must have known that this evidence was about to be presented in court - so why did he not tell his Defence counter-part that this evidence about ALARM was likely to be coming up in court? Surely this looks like John Kelsey-Fry is part of some bigger plan to damage the defence case by underhanded methods? This just goes to demonstrate that the legal profession is full of characters like John Kelsey-Fry, who are only too willing to act unethically in order to win a case.

Sir John Nutting QC expert evidence needs polygraph lie detector

Sir John Nutting QC will be asked to undergo a polygraph lie detector test to confirm whether he was involved in conspiring with Professor Meirion Francis Lewis to present false evidence at my trial in 1993 regarding the ALARM missile.

It will obvious to any technically minded person that there was something fundamentally wrong with the testimony given by Professor Meirion Francis Lewis at my trial, when he unexpectedly gave evidence that a 10-year old low-level document had been used on ALARM missiles deployed during the Gulf War of 1991.

The facts behind this issue will be available on this blog in the very near future.

20 August 2009

John Alexander Symonds - The Romeo Spy website

After many years, John Alexander Symonds has decided to present the truth about what happened in his life, and particularly the method by which he was convicted based on the evidence of a criminal and dubious tape recorded conversations. Read all about it on the new website of the "Romeo Spy".

Sir John Nutting QC & John Kelsey Fry QC

Sir John Nutting QC still brags about the way he achieved my conviction based on lies and legal tricks. See his discredited admission here about the Michael Smith case.

John Kelsey Fry QC is also boasting about his involvement in my case here. Why is he proud to have been connected with a case that shows he was guilty of the manipulation of evidence, that included the culpability of Dame Stella Rimington, Oleg Gordievsky, and Professor Meirion Francis Lewis in framing me?

Why can British lawyers get away with legal fraud? How is it that they are not behind bars for telling lies in court?

from: Mike Smith
to: Sir John Nutting QC , Mr John Kelsey-Fry QC
cc Sir Derek Spencer QC , "DUDDRIDGE MP, James" , “Colin Nicholls QC”
date: Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 12:24 AM
subject: Thank you for using false evidence at my trial

To: Sir John Nutting QC & John Kelsey Fry QC

It is fortunate for me that you continue to boast about the role that you played in presenting false evidence at my trial:

UK Legal Forum post

I shall now feel quite justified in making you one of the main targets in my campaign to expose the lies that were presented at my trial under your prosecution case. You know what you did, and you do not need me to tell you what a despicable distortion you presented as "evidence" in order to convince a jury that your arguments were valid.

We shall see who was right in the final countdown.

Please reply to this email, because if you do not I shall simply name you and shame you as the liars and cheats I believe you to be.

Yours sincerely,
Michael John Smith